InPlaLabs Key Concepts for Integrated Planning Discourse - Revision history

Admin at 15:20, 4 March 2026

2026-03-04T15:20:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 4 March 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	'''The publication InPlaLabs Key Concepts for Integrated Planning Discourse is available here: https://helios.ntua.gr/pluginfile.php/326983/mod_folder/content/0/Key%20concepts%20for%20integrated%20planning%20discourse.pdf'''		'''The publication InPlaLabs Key Concepts for Integrated Planning Discourse is available here: https://helios.ntua.gr/pluginfile.php/326983/mod_folder/content/0/Key%20concepts%20for%20integrated%20planning%20discourse.pdf'''


	== Key Concepts ==		== Key Concepts ==

	* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]		* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]
	* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]		* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]

Admin: /* Inclusive Planning */

2026-03-04T15:19:27Z

Inclusive Planning

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 4 March 2026
Line 441:		Line 441:

	''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''		''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''


	=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===		=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===

Line 452:		Line 450:

	Ultimately, inclusive planning reflects democratic principles by promoting participatory governance and striving to produce urban environments that are socially just, accessible, and sustainable.		Ultimately, inclusive planning reflects democratic principles by promoting participatory governance and striving to produce urban environments that are socially just, accessible, and sustainable.


	=== Contested Meanings / Debates in the Literature ===		=== Contested Meanings / Debates in the Literature ===

Line 467:		Line 463:

	These debates highlight a broader tension between the normative aspirations of inclusive planning and the institutional realities of planning practice. While inclusive planning remains a key framework for advancing socially just urban development, its transformative potential depends on moving beyond symbolic participation toward genuinely redistributive and epistemically diverse planning processes.		These debates highlight a broader tension between the normative aspirations of inclusive planning and the institutional realities of planning practice. While inclusive planning remains a key framework for advancing socially just urban development, its transformative potential depends on moving beyond symbolic participation toward genuinely redistributive and epistemically diverse planning processes.


	=== Applications in Practice ===		=== Applications in Practice ===

Line 487:		Line 481:
	* '''Stakeholder engagement in climate governance'''		* '''Stakeholder engagement in climate governance'''
	→ Climate action plans increasingly incorporate participatory frameworks to involve communities in shaping adaptation and mitigation strategies.		→ Climate action plans increasingly incorporate participatory frameworks to involve communities in shaping adaptation and mitigation strategies.


	=== Selected References & Key Readings ===		=== Selected References & Key Readings ===

Line 513:		Line 505:
	-----		-----
	-----		-----

	== Co-creation in urban planning ==		== Co-creation in urban planning ==

Admin: /* Key Concepts */

2026-03-04T15:19:01Z

Key Concepts

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 4 March 2026
Line 21:		Line 21:
	* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]		* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]
	* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]		* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]
	* [[#Data-driven planning\|Data-driven planning]]		* [[#Data-driven planning: Role, limitations and biases of spatial analysis, urban analytics and data in spatial planning\|Data-driven planning]]
	* [[#Inclusive Planning\|Inclusive Planning]]		* [[#Inclusive Planning\|Inclusive Planning]]
	* [[#Co-creation in urban planning\|Co-creation in Urban Planning]]		* [[#Co-creation in urban planning\|Co-creation in Urban Planning]]

Admin: /* Data-driven planning */

2026-03-04T15:18:42Z

Data-driven planning

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 4 March 2026
Line 371:		Line 371:
	-----		-----
	-----		-----
	== Data-driven planning ==		== Data-driven planning: Role, limitations and biases of spatial analysis, urban analytics and data in spatial planning ==
	~~'''~~Role, limitations and biases of spatial analysis, urban analytics and data in spatial planning~~'''~~

	''Authors: Yannis Paraskevopoulos, Anastasia Christaki, Stefanos Tsigdinos, Ioannis Chatziioannou''		''Authors: Yannis Paraskevopoulos, Anastasia Christaki, Stefanos Tsigdinos, Ioannis Chatziioannou''


	=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===		=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===

	'''Data-driven planning''' refers to an approach in spatial, urban, and regional planning in which decisions regarding land use, infrastructure, environmental management, mobility systems, and urban development are informed by the systematic collection, integration, analysis, visualization, modelling, and interpretation of spatial and urban data.		'''Data-driven planning''' refers to an approach in spatial, urban, and regional planning in which decisions regarding land use, infrastructure, environmental management, mobility systems, and urban development are informed by the systematic collection, integration, analysis, visualization, modelling, and interpretation of spatial and urban data.

Line 396:		Line 392:

	Through scenario modelling, impact assessment, and iterative monitoring, data-driven approaches are often presented as a pathway toward more transparent, accountable, and evidence-based planning decisions. In this perspective, planning practice evolves from intuition-driven or discretionary decision-making toward a more analytical and model-supported form of urban governance.		Through scenario modelling, impact assessment, and iterative monitoring, data-driven approaches are often presented as a pathway toward more transparent, accountable, and evidence-based planning decisions. In this perspective, planning practice evolves from intuition-driven or discretionary decision-making toward a more analytical and model-supported form of urban governance.


	=== Contested Meanings / Debates in the Literature ===		=== Contested Meanings / Debates in the Literature ===

	Despite its widespread adoption, data-driven planning has generated significant debates regarding knowledge production, governance, and power.		Despite its widespread adoption, data-driven planning has generated significant debates regarding knowledge production, governance, and power.

Line 411:		Line 404:

	Finally, growing debates explore '''ethical and participatory approaches to urban data'''. While participatory GIS, volunteered geographic information (VGI), and crowdsourced mapping promise greater inclusion, critics argue that these tools can reproduce existing power asymmetries unless governed collaboratively. Emerging concepts such as “data gardening” advocate for more reflexive, ethical, and community-oriented data practices that emphasise co-production and local autonomy.		Finally, growing debates explore '''ethical and participatory approaches to urban data'''. While participatory GIS, volunteered geographic information (VGI), and crowdsourced mapping promise greater inclusion, critics argue that these tools can reproduce existing power asymmetries unless governed collaboratively. Emerging concepts such as “data gardening” advocate for more reflexive, ethical, and community-oriented data practices that emphasise co-production and local autonomy.


	=== Applications in Practice ===		=== Applications in Practice ===

	* '''Mobility and transport planning'''		* '''Mobility and transport planning'''
	→ Mobility datasets derived from GPS devices, mobile phones, sensors, and public transport systems enable planners to analyse mobility flows, model accessibility, optimise public transport networks, and identify mobility inequalities.		→ Mobility datasets derived from GPS devices, mobile phones, sensors, and public transport systems enable planners to analyse mobility flows, model accessibility, optimise public transport networks, and identify mobility inequalities.
Line 423:		Line 413:
	* '''Participatory planning and community data'''		* '''Participatory planning and community data'''
	→ Citizen-generated datasets, crowdsourced mapping platforms, and participatory GIS initiatives provide new channels for integrating community knowledge into planning processes.		→ Citizen-generated datasets, crowdsourced mapping platforms, and participatory GIS initiatives provide new channels for integrating community knowledge into planning processes.


	=== Selected References & Key Readings ===		=== Selected References & Key Readings ===

Line 449:		Line 437:
	-----		-----
	-----		-----

	== Inclusive Planning ==		== Inclusive Planning ==

Admin: /* Integrated Spatial Planning */

2026-03-04T15:17:15Z

Integrated Spatial Planning

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 4 March 2026
Line 32:		Line 32:
	== Integrated Spatial Planning ==		== Integrated Spatial Planning ==
	''Authors: Yannis Paraskevopoulos, Anastasia Christaki, Stefanos Tsigdinos, Ioannis Chatziioannou''		''Authors: Yannis Paraskevopoulos, Anastasia Christaki, Stefanos Tsigdinos, Ioannis Chatziioannou''

	'''Integrated spatial planning''' refers to a systemic approach to planning that coordinates land-use, mobility, environmental, social and economic policies in order to guide the sustainable development of cities and regions. The concept has become central to contemporary debates on urban governance, sustainability transitions and interdisciplinary planning practice.		'''Integrated spatial planning''' refers to a systemic approach to planning that coordinates land-use, mobility, environmental, social and economic policies in order to guide the sustainable development of cities and regions. The concept has become central to contemporary debates on urban governance, sustainability transitions and interdisciplinary planning practice.
	=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===		=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===
Line 92:		Line 93:
	-----		-----
	-----		-----

	== Urban Sustainability ==		== Urban Sustainability ==
	''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''		''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''

Admin: /* Co-creation in urban planning */

2026-03-04T15:16:22Z

Co-creation in urban planning

Admin: /* Urban Health */

2026-03-04T15:15:38Z

Urban Health

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 4 March 2026
Line 596:		Line 596:

	''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''		''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''


	=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===		=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===

Line 605:		Line 603:

	Within mainstream planning and public health frameworks, urban health can be addressed through a combination of public health strategies, spatial planning regulations, environmental monitoring, and urban design interventions that aim to improve living conditions and reduce health risks.		Within mainstream planning and public health frameworks, urban health can be addressed through a combination of public health strategies, spatial planning regulations, environmental monitoring, and urban design interventions that aim to improve living conditions and reduce health risks.


	=== Contested Meanings / Debates in the Literature ===		=== Contested Meanings / Debates in the Literature ===

Line 626:		Line 622:

	Feminist and decolonial scholarship further calls for more inclusive frameworks that recognize lived experiences, care practices, and indigenous knowledge systems as important components of urban health governance.		Feminist and decolonial scholarship further calls for more inclusive frameworks that recognize lived experiences, care practices, and indigenous knowledge systems as important components of urban health governance.


	=== Applications in Practice ===		=== Applications in Practice ===

	Urban health perspectives are increasingly integrated into planning and governance practices.		Urban health perspectives are increasingly integrated into planning and governance practices.

Line 643:		Line 636:
	* '''Healthy Cities and cross-sector collaboration'''		* '''Healthy Cities and cross-sector collaboration'''
	→ Urban planning and public health institutions collaborate within frameworks such as the WHO Healthy Cities initiative to promote age-friendly, inclusive, and health-supportive urban environments.		→ Urban planning and public health institutions collaborate within frameworks such as the WHO Healthy Cities initiative to promote age-friendly, inclusive, and health-supportive urban environments.


	=== Selected References & Key Readings ===		=== Selected References & Key Readings ===

	WHO (2016). ''Urban Green Spaces and Health – A Review of Evidence.''		WHO (2016). ''Urban Green Spaces and Health – A Review of Evidence.''
	→ ''A widely cited report demonstrating the relationship between green infrastructure and health outcomes in cities.''		→ ''A widely cited report demonstrating the relationship between green infrastructure and health outcomes in cities.''
Line 675:		Line 665:
	-----		-----
	-----		-----

	== Green digital skills ==		== Green digital skills ==
	''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''		''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''

Admin: /* Key Concepts */

2026-03-04T15:15:00Z

Key Concepts

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 4 March 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]		* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]
	* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]		* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]
	* [[#Justice and the City\|Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate and Mobility Justice]]		* [[#Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate and Mobility Justice\|Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate and Mobility Justice]]
	* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]		* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]
	* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]		* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]

Admin at 15:14, 4 March 2026

2026-03-04T15:14:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 4 March 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]		* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]
	* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]		* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]
	* [[#Justice and the City\|Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate, and Mobility Justice]]		* [[#Justice and the City\|Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate and Mobility Justice]]
	* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]		* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]
	* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]		* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]

Admin at 15:13, 4 March 2026

2026-03-04T15:13:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 4 March 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== Key Concepts ==		== Key Concepts ==

	* [[Integrated Spatial Planning]]		* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]
	* [[Urban Sustainability]]		* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]
	* [[Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate, and Mobility Justice]]		* [[#Justice and the City\|Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate, and Mobility Justice]]
	* [[Transport Equity]]		* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]
	* [[Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]		* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]
	* [[Data-driven planning]]		* [[#Data-driven planning\|Data-driven planning]]
	* [[Inclusive Planning]]		* [[#Inclusive Planning\|Inclusive Planning]]
	* [[Co-creation in Urban Planning]]		* [[#Co-creation in urban planning\|Co-creation in Urban Planning]]
	* [[Urban Health]]		* [[#Urban Health\|Urban Health]]
	* [[Green Digital Skills]]		* [[#Green digital skills\|Green Digital Skills]]

	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 4 March 2026
Line 21:		Line 21:
	* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]		* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]
	* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]		* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]
	* [[#Data-driven planning\|Data-driven planning]]		* [[#Data-driven planning: Role, limitations and biases of spatial analysis, urban analytics and data in spatial planning\|Data-driven planning]]
	* [[#Inclusive Planning\|Inclusive Planning]]		* [[#Inclusive Planning\|Inclusive Planning]]
	* [[#Co-creation in urban planning\|Co-creation in Urban Planning]]		* [[#Co-creation in urban planning\|Co-creation in Urban Planning]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 4 March 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]		* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]
	* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]		* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]
	* [[#Justice and the City\|Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate and Mobility Justice]]		* [[#Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate and Mobility Justice\|Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate and Mobility Justice]]
	* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]		* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]
	* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]		* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 4 March 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]		* [[#Integrated Spatial Planning\|Integrated Spatial Planning]]
	* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]		* [[#Urban Sustainability\|Urban Sustainability]]
	* [[#Justice and the City\|Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate, and Mobility Justice]]		* [[#Justice and the City\|Justice and the City: Spatial, Climate and Mobility Justice]]
	* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]		* [[#Transport Equity\|Transport Equity]]
	* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]		* [[#Accessibility and the 15-minute city\|Accessibility and the 15-minute city]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 4 March 2026
Line 525:		Line 525:

	''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''		''Authors: Nadia Charalambous, Mariam Shulqamy, Frixos Petrou, Rafaela Christodoulou''


	=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===		=== Mainstream / Conventional Definition ===

	'''Co-creation in urban planning''' refers to a collaborative governance approach in which citizens, public institutions, and researchers collectively define urban problems and co-develop solutions. Rather than functioning as a symbolic form of participation, co-creation emphasizes shared decision-making, innovation, and collaborative knowledge production as central elements of legitimate planning processes.		'''Co-creation in urban planning''' refers to a collaborative governance approach in which citizens, public institutions, and researchers collectively define urban problems and co-develop solutions. Rather than functioning as a symbolic form of participation, co-creation emphasizes shared decision-making, innovation, and collaborative knowledge production as central elements of legitimate planning processes.

Line 534:		Line 531:

	This approach is frequently operationalized through experimental governance environments such as '''Urban Living Labs'''. Initiatives like CLEVER Cities and Sharing Cities illustrate how structured co-creation frameworks can align participatory practices with strategic planning and policy processes. Research suggests that the effectiveness of co-creation often depends on the quality of facilitation, informal engagement processes, and the ability to integrate local knowledge into planning outcomes.		This approach is frequently operationalized through experimental governance environments such as '''Urban Living Labs'''. Initiatives like CLEVER Cities and Sharing Cities illustrate how structured co-creation frameworks can align participatory practices with strategic planning and policy processes. Research suggests that the effectiveness of co-creation often depends on the quality of facilitation, informal engagement processes, and the ability to integrate local knowledge into planning outcomes.


	=== Contested Meanings / Debates in the Literature ===		=== Contested Meanings / Debates in the Literature ===

	Although co-creation is often presented as a transformative approach to urban governance, its meaning and implementation remain subject to significant debate.		Although co-creation is often presented as a transformative approach to urban governance, its meaning and implementation remain subject to significant debate.

Line 549:		Line 543:

	Ultimately, debates around co-creation highlight that its legitimacy depends not only on participatory methods but also on the extent to which processes genuinely redistribute decision-making power and respond to context-specific socio-political conditions.		Ultimately, debates around co-creation highlight that its legitimacy depends not only on participatory methods but also on the extent to which processes genuinely redistribute decision-making power and respond to context-specific socio-political conditions.


	=== Applications in Practice ===		=== Applications in Practice ===

	Co-creation is increasingly applied across a wide range of planning contexts and governance frameworks.		Co-creation is increasingly applied across a wide range of planning contexts and governance frameworks.

Line 572:		Line 563:
	* '''Design charrettes and citizen assemblies'''		* '''Design charrettes and citizen assemblies'''
	→ Structured workshops and deliberative forums where planners, citizens, and stakeholders jointly develop urban visions, strategies, or spatial design proposals.		→ Structured workshops and deliberative forums where planners, citizens, and stakeholders jointly develop urban visions, strategies, or spatial design proposals.


	=== Selected References & Key Readings ===		=== Selected References & Key Readings ===

	Lund, D. H. (2023). ''Co-Creation in Urban Governance: From Inclusion to Innovation.''		Lund, D. H. (2023). ''Co-Creation in Urban Governance: From Inclusion to Innovation.''
	→ ''Examines how co-creation reframes legitimacy in planning by shifting from participatory ideals toward innovation-oriented governance.''		→ ''Examines how co-creation reframes legitimacy in planning by shifting from participatory ideals toward innovation-oriented governance.''
Line 593:		Line 581:
	-----		-----
	-----		-----

	== Urban Health ==		== Urban Health ==